All work

Discovery · Liber · Research leadership and process development

How we made customer and user insight part of the investment decisions

I developed and embedded a shared way of working for how Liber continuously involves customers and users in product development. It helps the teams use what is already known, find the knowledge gaps, explore needs and test concepts before larger product and investment decisions are made.

Year
2026, ongoing
Industry
Learning materials
Company
Liber AB
Scope
4 months

The short version

The problem

Customer and user insights were collected all over the organisation, but there was no shared way to document, share and use them. Decisions risked resting on assumptions.

What I did

I mapped the current state, developed the process with key people through interviews and workshops, and supported five pilot initiatives hands-on through their discovery phase.

What I delivered

A shared way of working, a resource bank with 18 guides, templates and AI supports, and a description of what is done in each phase of the development process.

01

The problem

Customer and user insights were collected in different parts of the organisation, but there was no shared way to document, share and use that knowledge in product development. That had three consequences.

Existing insights were overlooked

Knowledge that already existed risked not being used.

Studies were repeated

Similar studies were carried out several times.

Customers came in too late

Customers and users were involved late in the work.

Decisions therefore risked being based on assumptions, and concepts were sometimes developed long before their relevance and value had been tested.

02

The change challenge

The challenge was to create one way of working that several functions, projects and product areas could use, each with its own needs and habits.

It had to be clear enough to give structure and comparable material for decisions, and flexible enough to work in very different initiatives.

Continuous, not occasional

It also had to create the practical conditions for involving customers and users continuously, not only in occasional research efforts.

03

How I worked

My role

I led the work of mapping the current state, gathering perspectives from different parts of the organisation and identifying what stood in the way of a more continuous insight practice.

Through interviews and workshops I developed the process together with key people from the business. I structured the way of working, defined the decision points, and created support for how teams gather existing knowledge, identify assumptions and plan the right kind of customer and user involvement.

The team

The work was cross-functional, together with CX, process owners, product management, publishers and project managers. Their different perspectives were needed for the way of working to function both strategically and in day-to-day product development.

Five pilot initiatives

The way of working was shaped in real projects. Five initiatives, each in a different subject and school level, served as pilots during their discovery phase. I supported each of them hands-on, step by step, and used what we learned to build the method support.

  • 1SwedishPrimary school, years 1–4
  • 2SwedishLower secondary school, years 7–9
  • 3Mathematics, digital platformLower secondary school
  • 4MathematicsUpper secondary school
  • 5SFISwedish for immigrants

Why pilots

Working through every step together with the teams showed what they needed in practice. That is how the support became tailored to Liber’s organisation, and not a generic method.

04

The new way of working

The new way of working connects three things: existing knowledge, continuous customer and user involvement, and concrete product decisions.

Easy use of existing customer and user knowledge to separate what we already know from what we need to explore further
A shared way of working for customer analysis where insights inform choices and investment decisions
Easy access to target groups for qualitative and quantitative research with target groups in customer analysis
Goal Focused target-group research in customer analysis, to create a basis for choices and insight-driven decisions.

Four choices behind it

Start with what we already know

Gather what the organisation already knows before new research is planned.

Separate knowledge from assumptions

Make visible what is supported by evidence, what is uncertain and which knowledge gaps exist.

Tie the involvement to a decision

Start from the choice or decision the study should contribute to.

Explore before solution, test before investment

Understand needs and test concepts before larger investments are made.

Seven steps in practice

  1. Clarify the decisionDefine which decision or choice the insights should support.
  2. Gather existing knowledgeFind out what the organisation already knows.
  3. Identify knowledge gapsSeparate evidenced insights from assumptions and open questions.
  4. Plan the involvementChoose the method based on what the team needs to understand or try.
  5. Carry out and analyseCollect and structure relevant customer and user insights. That can mean exploring teachers’ and pupils’ needs, understanding existing ways of working and problems, testing early ideas or hypotheses, comparing alternative concepts, or validating a value proposition or a direction.
  6. Turn insights into decisionsConnect the result to priorities, concepts and choices.
  7. Document and reuseMake the knowledge searchable and usable in coming initiatives.

Two situations where it is used

Situation 01

When we explore a need

The team gathers existing knowledge, identifies the critical questions and involves relevant teachers or pupils before a solution direction is formulated. The result is used to prioritise which problem is most important to solve.

Situation 02

When we test a concept

The team formulates which assumptions need to be validated and lets customers or users react to alternative concepts. The results are used to choose a direction, change the solution or refrain from an investment.

05

Method support for every step

A way of working only gets used if people have something to work with. I delivered the method support as a resource bank for customer and user insight: AI support, guides and templates for every step from question to insight.

The resource bank start page, in Swedish: a search field, the heading AI support, guides and templates for every step from question to insight, filters for templates, AI support, guides and workshops, and four numbered step cards
The resource bank. A team chooses the stage it is in and downloads what it needs. Click the image to enlarge it.

The resources are sorted under four stages, from planning to using the insights.

  1. Plan ahead of project planningMake sure that what is going to be explored is clear and tied to a decision, and choose the methods that best help reduce uncertainty. 5 resources.
  2. Carry out a customer analysisFill in the customer analysis brief and draft the interview, test or survey questions. 11 resources.
  3. Analyse and synthesiseWork through the material to bring out findings, insights and opportunities. 1 resource.
  4. Share and use insightsGo from insights to a recommendation ahead of a decision. 1 resource.

Four kinds of support, 18 resources

10 resources

AI support

Ready-made prompts that work as a knowledgeable sounding board and take a team faster from question to insight.

6 resources

Guides

Show how each step is done.

1 resource

Templates

Filled in together by the team.

1 resource

Workshops

Tips on how to work together.

To give the teams easy access to their target groups, I also helped establish a respondent panel.

06

What is done, phase by phase

A resource is only useful if people know when to reach for it. So alongside the resource bank I described what is actually done in each phase of Liber’s development process: the operative activities of customer analysis, and the guide, template or AI support that goes with each one.

When is new customer analysis done?

When there is a prioritised uncertainty about customers or users, and more knowledge could change a choice, a solution, the quality of the product or a decision. The questions always come before the method.

Know what to find out before the project starts

  1. What do we know?
  2. What is uncertain?
  3. Customer analysis questions
  4. Method
  5. Planned activities
  6. Decision to start

Work that often happened after the start is moved, as far as possible, to before the decision. That does not mean everything is planned in detail. It means the team starts knowing what is already understood, what is still uncertain, and which decision each question feeds.

Activities

  • WorkshopCompile existing customer knowledgeGather and show what is already known, and the known gaps, tied to the decisions the project should give a better basis for.
  • GuideAI supportFormulate and prioritise the questionsState what needs to be better understood about the customer or user, and which decision or choice each question should feed.
  • AI supportWorkshopGet support with questions and methodGo from existing knowledge and identified uncertainties to clear questions and a first choice of method.
  • GuideAI supportRecommend a methodOne method or a combination, based on the kind of knowledge the prioritised questions need.
  • Plan the first activitiesMake sure the activities and chosen methods are in the overall activity plan.
  • Show it in the decision materialExisting knowledge, prioritised questions and planned activities are visible to the decision forum.

GuideAI supportTemplateWorkshop The tags show which resources in the resource bank support the activity.